Volvo 850 1993 vs Volvo S80 2000
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 200 HP | |
Torque: | 220 NM | 285 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo 850 engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Volvo S80. Due to the lower power, Volvo 850 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 10.0 | |
The Volvo 850 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo 850 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Volvo 850 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 360'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo 850 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 3 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S70 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S60 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo 850 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Volvo 850 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.71 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
Volvo 850 is smaller. Volvo 850 is 11 cm shorter than the Volvo S80, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 440 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1110 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo 850 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo S80, which means Volvo 850 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`070 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | Volvo S80 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo 850 has serious deffects in 230 percent more cases than Volvo S80, so Volvo S80 quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 850 has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |