Volvo 850 1993 vs Volvo V70 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 220 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Volvo 850 engine produces 30 HP more power than Volvo V70, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.1 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
730 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 560'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S70 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo S40, Volvo V50, Volvo S70 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo V70 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Volvo V70 2000 2.4 engine: The strengths of this engine lie in its durable components, long lifespan, reliability in everyday use, and substantial power reserves.
However, there are notable weaknesses. Early models were equipped ... More about Volvo V70 2000 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.71 m | 4.71 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.49 m | |
Volvo 850 and Volvo V70 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 485 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1641 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo 850 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo V70, which means Volvo 850 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`150 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | Volvo V70 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo 850 has serious deffects in 275 percent more cases than Volvo V70, so Volvo V70 quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 850 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |