Volvo 850 1993 vs Volkswagen Golf 1993

 
Volvo 850
1993 - 1994
Volkswagen Golf
1993 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.4 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 170 HP90 HP
Torque: 220 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds12.8 seconds
Volvo 850 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo 850 engine produces 80 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Volkswagen Golf. Thanks to more power Volvo 850 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.18.1
Real fuel consumption: 10.0 l/100km7.9 l/100km
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo 850 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 850 could require 150 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo 850 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf.
Fuel tank capacity: 73 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
730 km with real consumption750 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo 850 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years8 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S70Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volkswagen Vento, Seat Toledo, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Golf might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.71 m4.34 m
Width: 1.76 m1.70 m
Height: 1.43 m1.43 m
Volvo 850 is larger.
Volvo 850 is 37 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no data466 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1425 litres
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo 850 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Volvo 850 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6001`650
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Volvo 850 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Golf, so Volvo 850 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 600800
Pros and Cons: Volvo 850 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Volkswagen Golf has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv