Volvo 850 1993 vs Ford Escort 1992

 
Volvo 850
1993 - 1994
Ford Escort
1992 - 1995
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 170 HP90 HP
Torque: 220 NM134 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds12.8 seconds
Volvo 850 is more dynamic to drive.
Volvo 850 engine produces 80 HP more power than Ford Escort, whereas torque is 86 NM more than Ford Escort. Thanks to more power Volvo 850 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.17.3
Real fuel consumption: 10.0 l/100km7.9 l/100km
The Ford Escort is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo 850 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 850 could require 270 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo 850 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort.
Fuel tank capacity: 73 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
730 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption
Volvo 850 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo 850 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years3 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S70Used only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo 850 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.71 m4.27 m
Width: 1.76 m1.68 m
Height: 1.43 m1.35 m
Volvo 850 is larger.
Volvo 850 is 44 cm longer than the Ford Escort, 8 cm wider, while the height of Volvo 850 is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo 850 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Escort.
Gross weight: 1`600 kg850 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

low
Volvo 850 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Escort has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volvo 850, so Volvo 850 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8001800
Pros and Cons: Volvo 850 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Ford Escort has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv