Volvo 850 1993 vs Audi 100 1991

 
Volvo 850
1993 - 1994
Audi 100
1991 - 1994
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.3 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 170 HP133 HP
Torque: 220 NM186 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds10.5 seconds
Volvo 850 engine produces 37 HP more power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 34 NM more than Audi 100.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.19.9
Real fuel consumption: 10.0 l/100km9.8 l/100km
By specification Volvo 850 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that by driving the Volvo 850 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo 850 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100.
Fuel tank capacity: 73 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
730 km with real consumption810 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo 850 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S70Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi Coupe
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.71 m4.79 m
Width: 1.76 m1.78 m
Height: 1.43 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo 850 is 8 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 850 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data390 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1310 litres
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo 850 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Volvo 850 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6001`970
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

average
Volvo 850 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Audi 100 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volvo 850, so Volvo 850 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8001000
Pros and Cons: Volvo 850 has
  • more power
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv