Volvo 850 1992 vs Volvo S60 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo 850
1992 - 1994
Volvo S60
2000 - 2004
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Volvo 850 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo S60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.3 - 2.4 (petrol)2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 140 - 226 HP130 - 300 HP
Torque: 206 - 300 NM192 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.4 - 11 seconds5.7 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.1 - 9.76.5 - 13.0
Volvo 850 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.58 m
Width: 1.76 m1.80 m
Height: 1.40 m1.43 m
Volvo 850 is 8 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 850 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 445 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
Volvo 850 has more luggage capacity.
Volvo 850 has 21 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters13 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo 850 is 2.8 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Volvo 850 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`600~ 2`030
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 12001400
Pros and Cons: Volvo 850 has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • petrol and diesel engines available
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv