Volvo 850 1994 vs Volvo S40 2002

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo 850
1994 - 1997
Volvo S40
2002 - 2004
Body: Estate car / wagonSedan
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 2.51.6 - 1.9

Performance

Power: 126 - 250 HP102 - 200 HP
Torque: 170 - 350 NM145 - 300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.8 - 12.5 seconds7.3 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.0 - 11.15.4 - 10.0
Volvo 850 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo S40. On average, Volvo 850 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.72 m4.48 m
Width: 1.76 m1.72 m
Height: 1.43 m1.41 m
Volvo 850 is larger.
Volvo 850 is 24 cm longer than the Volvo S40, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo 850 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 960 litres471 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1580 litres853 litres
Volvo 850 has more luggage capacity.
Volvo 850 has 489 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 850 (by 727 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo 850 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Volvo 850 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`924~ 1`768
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 16001200
Rating in user reviews: 8.5/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo 850 has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Volvo S40 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv