Volvo 850 1993 vs Volvo S40 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.3 - 2.4 (petrol) | 1.6 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 226 HP | 90 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 206 - 300 NM | 143 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 11 seconds | 7.3 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 9.7 | 5.6 - 9.7 | |
|
Volvo 850 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo S40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Volvo 850 is larger. Volvo 850 is 23 cm longer than the Volvo S40, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volvo 850 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 853 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 850 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Volvo 850 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 1`756 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 850 has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |