Volkswagen Sharan 2015 vs Ford S-Max 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford S-Max, but torque is 10 NM more than Ford S-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.66 m | |
| Volkswagen Sharan is 6 cm longer than the Ford S-Max, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 955 litres | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 300 litres | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 955 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2430 litres | 2020 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space (by 15 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Sharan (by 410 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`310 kg | 2`450 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`642 kg | 1`645 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 668 kg | 805 kg | |
| Volkswagen Sharan load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem less than Ford S-Max. Therefore, Ford S-Max is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford S-Max has
| |