Volkswagen Sharan 2015 vs Toyota Proace 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 13 HP less power than Toyota Proace, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.4 | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Proace, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1520 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 5.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.98 m | |
| Volkswagen Sharan is 29 cm shorter than the Toyota Proace, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 26 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 955 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2430 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.7 metres less than that of the Toyota Proace, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`390 kg | 2`973 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`697 kg | 1`836 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 693 kg | 1`137 kg | |
| Volkswagen Sharan load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 64 procentiem less than Toyota Proace. Therefore, Toyota Proace is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Toyota Proace has
| |