Volkswagen Sharan 2015 vs Ford S-Max 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Sharan and Ford S-Max have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Sharan torque is 10 NM less than Ford S-Max. Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford S-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1290 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford S-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.66 m | |
| Volkswagen Sharan is 6 cm longer than the Ford S-Max, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 955 litres | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 300 litres | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 955 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2430 litres | 2020 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space (by 15 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Sharan (by 410 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`560 kg | 2`590 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`816 kg | 1`784 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 744 kg | 806 kg | |
| Volkswagen Sharan load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 8 procentiem less than Ford S-Max. Therefore, Ford S-Max is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |
