Volkswagen Sharan 2015 vs Toyota Proace 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 21 HP more power than Toyota Proace, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Toyota Proace. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.4 | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Proace, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1550 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 5.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.98 m | |
| Volkswagen Sharan is 29 cm shorter than the Toyota Proace, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 26 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 955 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2430 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.7 metres less than that of the Toyota Proace, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`400 kg | 2`973 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`725 kg | 1`836 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 675 kg | 1`137 kg | |
| Volkswagen Sharan load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 68 procentiem less than Toyota Proace. Therefore, Toyota Proace is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Toyota Proace has
| |