Volkswagen Sharan 2015 vs Ford Galaxy 2010

 
Volkswagen Sharan
2015 - 2018
Ford Galaxy
2010 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 184 HP140 HP
Torque: 380 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 seconds11.1 seconds
Volkswagen Sharan is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 44 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.36.0
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1320 km in combined cycle1160 km in combined cycle
1450 km on highway1340 km on highway
Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ...  More about Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.85 m4.82 m
Width: 1.90 m1.88 m
Height: 1.72 m1.76 m
Volkswagen Sharan is larger, but lower.
Volkswagen Sharan is 4 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 4 cm lower.
Seats: 5 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: 955 litres390 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 300 litres390 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 955 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
2430 litres2325 litres
In 7-seat version Ford Galaxy has more luggage space (by 90 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Sharan (by 105 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.9 meters
Gross weight: 2`400 kg2`505 kg
Net weight:1`729 kg1`656 kg
Load capacity:671 kg849 kg
Volkswagen Sharan load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem less than Ford Galaxy. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 14 2006600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Sharan has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Ford Galaxy has
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv