Volkswagen Sharan 2015 vs Seat Alhambra 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 44 HP more power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Seat Alhambra. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.7 | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan and Seat Alhambra are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 955 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2430 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Sharan has 688 litres more trunk space than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`400 kg | 2`370 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |