Volkswagen Sharan 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2010

 
Volkswagen Sharan
2010 - 2015
Ford Galaxy
2010 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 200 HP203 HP
Torque: 280 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.3 seconds8.8 seconds
Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 3 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Despite less power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.48.1
Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 45 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway1090 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.85 m4.82 m
Width: 1.90 m1.88 m
Height: 1.74 m1.76 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan is 4 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 885 litres390 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2430 litresno data
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Sharan has 495 litres more trunk space than the Ford Galaxy.
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`3602`450
Safety:
Ford Galaxy is better rated in child safety tests.
Quality:
low

low
Volkswagen Sharan has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Volkswagen Sharan quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 10 8009200
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Sharan has
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Ford Galaxy has
  • higher children safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv