Volkswagen Sharan 1997 vs Ford Galaxy 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Sharan and Ford Galaxy have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Sharan torque is 5 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.6 | 13.8 | |
| Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan and Ford Galaxy are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Volkswagen Sharan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Sharan, so Volkswagen Sharan quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |