Volkswagen Sharan 1997 vs Ford Galaxy 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.2 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 1 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 10.0 | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan and Ford Galaxy are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Volkswagen Sharan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Sharan, so Volkswagen Sharan quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |