Volkswagen Sharan 1997 vs Volkswagen Touran 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 34 HP less power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Touran 2004 2.0 engine: 2.0 FSI engine, part of the EA827 family, features a lightweight aluminum block with cast-iron liners and a unique timing system. A toothed belt drives the exhaust camshaft, while the intake camshaft is driven by a single-row chain, which also integrates with the variable valve timing mechanism. The timing regulator is ... More about Volkswagen Touran 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is larger. Volkswagen Sharan is 23 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 667 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1989 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Touran, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volkswagen Touran has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 290 percent more cases than Volkswagen Touran, so Volkswagen Touran quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |