Volkswagen Sharan 1997 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 34 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is larger. Volkswagen Sharan is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 240 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, so Mitsubishi Space Wagon quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |