Volkswagen Sharan 1997 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 162 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 4 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, but torque is 8 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is larger. Volkswagen Sharan is 35 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 11 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 676 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1498 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 1.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 6.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |