Volkswagen Sharan 1997 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996

 
Volkswagen Sharan
1997 - 2000
Chrysler Grand Voyager
1996 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol3.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 116 HP156 HP
Torque: 170 NM275 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.4 seconds11.7 seconds
Chrysler Grand Voyager is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 40 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.913.3
Real fuel consumption: 10.1 l/100km12.8 l/100km
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 510 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle560 km in combined cycle
970 km on highway700 km on highway
740 km with real consumption580 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.62 m5.07 m
Width: 1.81 m1.92 m
Height: 1.73 m1.74 m
Volkswagen Sharan is smaller.
Volkswagen Sharan is 45 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data671 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data4880 litres
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8002`500
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 10001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.4/10 7.0/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Sharan has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv