Volkswagen Sharan 1997 vs Ford Galaxy 1998
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 235 NM | 235 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.1 seconds | 19.1 seconds | |
Volkswagen Sharan and Ford Galaxy have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.8 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
1170 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.62 m | 4.62 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan and Ford Galaxy are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Volkswagen Sharan has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Volkswagen Sharan quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |