Volkswagen Sharan 1997 vs Ford Galaxy 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 235 NM | 202 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | 17.1 seconds | |
Volkswagen Sharan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 20 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.5 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
1410 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
1100 km with real consumption | 1110 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.62 m | 4.62 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan and Ford Galaxy are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Volkswagen Sharan has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Volkswagen Sharan quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |