Volkswagen Sharan 1997 vs Volkswagen Passat 1997

 
Volkswagen Sharan
1997 - 2000
Volkswagen Passat
1997 - 2000
Body: Minivan / MPVEstate car / wagon
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 110 HP90 HP
Torque: 235 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.4 seconds14 seconds
Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 20 HP more power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Volkswagen Passat. Despite the higher power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.55.5
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 150 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1150 km in combined cycle1120 km in combined cycle
1410 km on highway1370 km on highway
1100 km with real consumption1030 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.62 m4.67 m
Width: 1.81 m1.74 m
Height: 1.73 m1.50 m
Volkswagen Sharan is 5 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 23 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data495 litres
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0001`875
Safety:
Quality:
low

low
Volkswagen Passat has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Passat, so Volkswagen Passat quality is probably better
Average price (€): 10001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.4/10 7.3/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Sharan has
  • more power
  • lower price
Volkswagen Passat has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv