Volkswagen Sharan 1997 vs Toyota Picnic 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 20 HP more power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Toyota Picnic. Despite the higher power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1410 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 1100 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is larger. Volkswagen Sharan is 9 cm longer than the Toyota Picnic, 11 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Picnic, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 320 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |