Volkswagen Sharan 1997 vs Mercedes Vito 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 98 HP | |
Torque: | 202 NM | 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.3 seconds | 20.6 seconds | |
Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 8 HP less power than Mercedes Vito, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Mercedes Vito. Despite less power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 8.8 | |
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Sharan consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes Vito, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 78 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
1380 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.62 m | 4.66 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.73 m | 1.84 m | |
Volkswagen Sharan is smaller. Volkswagen Sharan is 4 cm shorter than the Mercedes Vito, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 11 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mercedes Vito, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Mercedes Vito has
| |