Volkswagen Sharan 1997 vs Ford Galaxy 2000

 
Volkswagen Sharan
1997 - 2000
Ford Galaxy
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP90 HP
Torque: 202 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 19.3 seconds17.2 seconds
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Sharan and Ford Galaxy have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Sharan torque is 38 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.66.3
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km6.3 l/100km
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 45 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1130 km in combined cycle1110 km in combined cycle
1380 km on highway1340 km on highway
1080 km with real consumption1110 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.62 m4.64 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.73 m1.73 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0002`000
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

low
Volkswagen Sharan has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Volkswagen Sharan quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 10001400
Rating in user reviews: 7.4/10 7.7/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Sharan has
  • lower price
Ford Galaxy has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv