Volkswagen Sharan 1997 vs Chrysler Voyager 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.3 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 24 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 1080 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 600'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Sharan engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Audi A4, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo, Seat Cordoba | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is smaller. Volkswagen Sharan is 11 cm shorter than the Chrysler Voyager, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.2 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Volkswagen Sharan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volkswagen Sharan, so Volkswagen Sharan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |