Volkswagen Sharan 1997 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.3 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 24 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 1080 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 600'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Sharan engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Audi A4, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo, Seat Cordoba | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is smaller. Volkswagen Sharan is 45 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 671 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4880 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |