Volkswagen Sharan 1997 vs Mazda MPV 1999

 
Volkswagen Sharan
1997 - 2000
Mazda MPV
1999 - 2002
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Petrol
Diesel (Volkswagen Sharan) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mazda MPV) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 90 HP122 HP
Torque: 202 NM175 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 19.3 seconds14.2 seconds
Mazda MPV is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 32 HP less power than Mazda MPV, but torque is 27 NM more than Mazda MPV. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 5.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.610.1
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Sharan consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MPV, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 525 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1130 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
1380 km on highway810 km on highway
Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 600'000 km630'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 5 years7 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Audi A4, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo, Seat CordobaInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Premacy
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Sharan might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Volkswagen Sharan engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.62 m4.75 m
Width: 1.81 m1.83 m
Height: 1.73 m1.74 m
Volkswagen Sharan is smaller.
Volkswagen Sharan is 13 cm shorter than the Mazda MPV, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 1 cm lower.
Seats: no data7 seats
Trunk capacity: no data294 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data294 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1600 litres
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda MPV.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0002`230
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Sharan has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Mazda MPV has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv