Volkswagen Sharan 1997 vs Hyundai H1 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 208 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.3 seconds | 21.5 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 10 HP more power than Hyundai H1, but torque is 6 NM less than Hyundai H1. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 14.1 | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Sharan consumes 7.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai H1, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 1125 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 460 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Sharan) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Hyundai H1) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is smaller. Volkswagen Sharan is 8 cm shorter than the Hyundai H1, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3295 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
| |