Volkswagen Sharan 1999 vs Ford Galaxy 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 35 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 10.0 | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Volkswagen Sharan 1999 1.8 engine: The weakest link in this engine is the turbine, whose failure is contributed to by a faulty catalytic converter. The oil pump and chain tensioner also tend to have problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan and Ford Galaxy are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Volkswagen Sharan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volkswagen Sharan, so Volkswagen Sharan quality is probably better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |