Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Seat Alhambra 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 204 HP | 204 HP | |
Torque: | 265 NM | 265 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
Volkswagen Sharan and Seat Alhambra have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 11.0 | |
Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
780 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan and Seat Alhambra are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | below average | |
Seat Alhambra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 2200 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |