Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Chrysler Voyager 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 48 HP more power than Chrysler Voyager, but torque is 10 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 | 12.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.8 l/100km | 11.6 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 540 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is smaller. Volkswagen Sharan is 10 cm shorter than the Chrysler Voyager, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 450 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.6 metres less than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Volkswagen Sharan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 395 percent more cases than Volkswagen Sharan, so Volkswagen Sharan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.1/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |