Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Ford Galaxy 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 43 HP more power than Ford Galaxy. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| 630 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Sharan is 19 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Volkswagen Sharan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Sharan, so Volkswagen Sharan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
| |