Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Citroen C8 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 208 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 285 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 4 HP less power than Citroen C8, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Citroen C8. Despite less power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 11.5 | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C8, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is smaller. Volkswagen Sharan is 10 cm shorter than the Citroen C8, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 225 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 225 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2948 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Citroen C8 has
| |