Volkswagen Sharan 2005 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan 2010 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Sharan 2005 and Volkswagen Sharan 2010 have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Sharan 2005 torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan 2010. Volkswagen Sharan 2005 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Sharan 2005 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan 2010, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan 2005 could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan 2005 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volkswagen Sharan 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Sharan 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan 2005 is smaller. Volkswagen Sharan 2005 is 22 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan 2010, 9 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | 809 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan 2010 has more luggage space. Volkswagen Sharan 2005 has 553 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan 2010. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan 2005 is 1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan 2010, which means Volkswagen Sharan 2005 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`340 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |