Volkswagen Sharan 2005 vs Seat Alhambra 2005

 
Volkswagen Sharan
2005 - 2010
Seat Alhambra
2005 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 140 HP140 HP
Torque: 310 NM310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.8 seconds12.2 seconds
Volkswagen Sharan and Seat Alhambra have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.26.7
Real fuel consumption: 7.6 l/100km7.5 l/100km
By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1120 km in combined cycle1040 km in combined cycle
920 km with real consumption930 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.63 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.73 m1.74 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan and Seat Alhambra are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 256 litres256 litres
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 1 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0002`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

below average
Seat Alhambra has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably better
Average price (€): 26002600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Sharan has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Seat Alhambra has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv