Volkswagen Sharan 2005 vs Citroen C8 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Citroen C8 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 33 HP less power than Citroen C8, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Citroen C8. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.2 | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C8, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is smaller. Volkswagen Sharan is 10 cm shorter than the Citroen C8, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 256 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2948 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`530 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Citroen C8 has
| |