Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Citroen C8 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 138 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.2 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Citroen C8 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 23 HP less power than Citroen C8, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Citroen C8. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.6 | |
|
The Citroen C8 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C8, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C8 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is smaller. Volkswagen Sharan is 10 cm shorter than the Citroen C8, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 225 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 225 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2948 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`435 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen C8 has
| |