Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Seat Alhambra 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 170 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
Volkswagen Sharan and Seat Alhambra have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
690 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan and Seat Alhambra are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 256 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 1 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | below average | |
Seat Alhambra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 2200 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |