Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Seat Alhambra 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Sharan and Seat Alhambra have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan and Seat Alhambra are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 256 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 256 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2610 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 1 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`800 kg | 2`430 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Seat Alhambra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |