Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Nissan Serena 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Nissan Serena is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 30 HP less power than Nissan Serena, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Nissan Serena. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.3 | |
|
The Nissan Serena is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Serena, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is larger, but lower. Volkswagen Sharan is 11 cm longer than the Nissan Serena, 12 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 520 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan Serena. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Nissan Serena has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Nissan Serena, so Nissan Serena quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Serena has
| |