Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Mazda 5 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Mazda 5 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 30 HP less power than Mazda 5, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Mazda 5. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is larger. Volkswagen Sharan is 7 cm longer than the Mazda 5, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 112 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1566 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Mazda 5 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Sharan, so Mazda 5 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 5 has
| |