Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Kia Carens 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 145 HP | |
Torque: | 170 NM | 192 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Kia Carens is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 30 HP less power than Kia Carens, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Kia Carens. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
The Kia Carens is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carens, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carens. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
940 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
690 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.55 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.73 m | 1.65 m | |
Volkswagen Sharan is larger. Volkswagen Sharan is 9 cm longer than the Kia Carens, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 400 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2106 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.3 metres more than that of the Kia Carens. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`155 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 3000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Kia Carens has
| |