Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Seat Alhambra 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Sharan and Seat Alhambra have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 6.3 | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Sharan consumes 4.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 735 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan and Seat Alhambra are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 256 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Seat Alhambra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |