Volkswagen Sharan 2002 vs Seat Alhambra 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 15 HP more power than Seat Alhambra, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan and Seat Alhambra are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 256 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 1 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
| |