Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Ford Galaxy 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Sharan and Ford Galaxy have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
| By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Ford Galaxy has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Sharan, so Ford Galaxy quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.1/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |