Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Volkswagen Sharan) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi Space Wagon) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 35 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, but torque is 85 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 9.3 | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Sharan consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is larger. Volkswagen Sharan is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 240 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, so Mitsubishi Space Wagon quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.1/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |