Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Mercedes Vito 1999
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 122 HP | |
Torque: | 310 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
Volkswagen Sharan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 7 HP less power than Mercedes Vito, but torque is 10 NM more than Mercedes Vito. Despite less power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 8.0 | |
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes Vito, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 78 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
1340 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.66 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.73 m | 1.84 m | |
Volkswagen Sharan is smaller. Volkswagen Sharan is 3 cm shorter than the Mercedes Vito, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 11 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 1.5 metres less than that of the Mercedes Vito, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Mercedes Vito has
| |