Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Toyota Picnic 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 25 HP more power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Toyota Picnic. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is larger. Volkswagen Sharan is 10 cm longer than the Toyota Picnic, 11 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.1 metres less than that of the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 320 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.1/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |